Criminological Theory

Description

This semester, I’d like you to select one of the following offenders and provide a justification for which particular theory (that we’ve discussed thus far) best fits this individual. This 3-4 page (double spaced) assignment should include a short biography of the most criminologically significant events in this offender’s life. You should be able to apply the events to the key elements of the theory that you selected. Newspaper articles or books will also give hints as to which aspects of the offender are most noteworthy, and those same items can help you with your selection of the “best fit” theory. meet these requirements: 15.0 pts Main thesis is clearly stated and present throughout the paper. Uses appropriate, relevant, & compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding, and shaping the whole work. Completely accomplishes the goals of the assignment Fully & imaginatively supports thesis & purpose. Sequence of ideas is effective. Transitions are effective. Demonstrates successful execution of criminal justice conventions. Very few spelling errors, correct punctuation, and grammatically correct, leading to clear understanding of content Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is has very few errors in language, word choice, and sentence types. Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Doesn’t overuse quotes. Conforms to required referencing style. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described systematically, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a widespread analysis or synthesis. Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Specific position is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position are acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized. Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. Choose from one of the following offenders: David Berkowitz Timothy McVeigh Judy Buenoano Jeffrey Dahmer Scott Peterson Charles Manson Adam Lanza Lee Boyd Malvo Andrea Yates John Wayne Gacy Ted Bundy Aileen Wuornos Ted Kacyznski Jim Jones David Koresh Pablo Escobar

My Master Papers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -